Evaluation Process

  • Scientific Committee Members are established academics who hold PhDs or other terminal degrees in their fields that have previous peer review experience.
  • The Scientific Committee will make the final decision on abstracts.
  • Every abstract will undergo a double blind peer review by an International Scientific Committee Member within two to three weeks after its receipt.
  • Results of the abstract review will be sent to the author within two weeks of submission (Conditions apply if there is an emergency).
  • Notices of acceptance or rejection of the paper will be sent to the author with reviewer comments.
  • If revisions are required according to the reviewer comments, the revised abstract must be sent back within a week.

The Scientific Committee evaluates your abstract according to following criteria.

  • Aims/objectives clearly stated
  • Relevance to the conference
  • Structure of the Abstract
  • Clarity of language
  • Appropriateness of the research/study/ methodology
  • Discussion and conclusion

Selected Abstracts

Accepted abstract will be invited to present as oral, video recorded and poster presentation, and will be published in conference program and proceedings

Sr. #


Corresponding Author & Affiliation

Abstract Category