Evaluation Process

• Scientific Committee Members are established academics who hold PhDs or other terminal degrees in their fields that have previous peer review experience.
• The Scientific Committee will make the final decision on abstracts.
• Every abstract will undergo a double blind peer review by an International Scientific Committee Member within two to three weeks after its receipt.
• Results of the abstract review will be sent to the author within two weeks of submission (Conditions apply if there is an emergency).
• Notices of acceptance or rejection of the paper will be sent to the author with reviewer comments.
• If revisions are required according to the reviewer comments, the revised abstract must be sent back within a week.

The Scientific Committee evaluates your abstract according to following criteria.

• Aims/objectives clearly stated
• Relevance to the conference
• Structure of the Abstract
• Clarity of language
• Appropriateness of the research/study/ methodology
• Discussion and conclusion